![]() |
IOC President Jacques Rogge congratulates LOCOG Chairman Seb Coe following the successful Olympic bid in Singapore, 2005 |
In a previous post, I explored how part of my pessimism leading up to the 2012 Olympics was based on the logo. It was a first impression I believed organisers and designers got wrong - especially the mascot - but a first impression nonetheless.
Poor visual identity can still be overcome by delivering on brand promise and providing a great customer experience. In the following series of posts, I look at the other aspects of London 2012.
Delivering a great customer experience requires a clear message that aligns the entire organisation. That message is formed by understanding the needs of the people most important to your brand.
STEP 1 - DEFINE THE STAKEHOLDERS
The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG) stated their goal was to "deliver the best possible Olympic and Paralympic Games experience for everyone involved, ensuring a real legacy and inspiring people to join in and truly make these 'everyone's Games.'"
In this case, "everyone involved" includes:
- Athletes - essentially the product on display, but also consumers of the Games - hoping to compete for their countries and gain notoriety
- Londoners - who hope to benefit from a tourism boost in the short-term and infrastructure improvements in the longer-term, not to mention the pride of being a host city
- Visitors experiencing the Games
- Corporate Sponsors - since over $1 billion was raised from sponsors, these partners hope to gain from publicity of being associated with the Games
STEP 2 - UNDERSTAND STAKEHOLDER NEEDS
During their official bid presentation in Singapore, 2005, Bid Chairman, Seb Coe outlined the three principles that would guide London 2012 organisers:
- "First, we want to deliver...an electrifying experience for competitors and spectators...which distinguishes the Olympic Games from other sports events. And that magic begins with the venues.
- Our second principle is to be your best partners. IOC members...Sponsors and the media.
- Our third principle is to deliver a lasting sporting legacy...We can no longer take it for granted that young people will choose sport. Some may lack the facilities. Or the coaches and role models to teach them...We are determined that a London Games will address that challenge."
More specifically:
- For Athletes - Denise Lewis, representing the London Athletes Commission, explained “everything athletes need was designed in from day one. Training venues. Security. When a fraction of a second, or a fraction of a centimetre, can be the difference between winning and losing and can change your life...you appreciate that the small details have been worked out years before."
- For Londoners - Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London, pledged “the Games will dramatically improve the lives of Londoners.” Prime Minister, Tony Blair furthered: "Our vision is to see millions more young people in Britain...participating in sport, and improving their lives as a result of that participation...But it takes more than 17 days of superb Olympic competition. It takes a broader vision."
- For Visitors - Livingstone continued: "As London's Mayor, I know hat what you want from me is to take whatever measures are necessary to deliver a safe, secure and superb Games."
- For Corporate Sponsors - According to the LOCOG website: "The London 2012 brand is also vital to the funding of the Games and is the London 2012 Organising Committee's most valuable asset. To ensure we maintain both the emotional and commercial value of the brand, we need to carefully control its use and prevent its unauthorised exploitation."
STEP 3 - PRIORITISE STAKEHOLDERS
A brand can't be all things to all people. The needs of certain groups will often conflict, so a company must choose whose needs take priority when conflicts arise.
The motto for London 2012 became 'Inspire a generation,' indicating that the youth of Britain and their future were the major priority.
STEP 4 - DELIVERING ON THE PROMISE TO STAKEHOLDERS
Only with a firm understanding of the promise to each stakeholder, can we fairly judge the Olympic experience.
In future posts, I'll begin to grade how LOCOG delivered on the promises it made.
In future posts, I'll begin to grade how LOCOG delivered on the promises it made.